By Moon Of Alabama
February 07, 2017 “Information Clearing House” – “Moon Of Alabama”
-A new Amnesty International report claims that the Syrian government
hanged between 5,000 and 13,000 prisoners in a military prison in Syria.
The evidence for that claim is flimsy, based on hearsay of anonymous
people outside of Syria. The numbers themselves are extrapolations that
no scientist or court would ever accept. It is tabloid reporting and
fiction style writing from its title “Human Slaughterhouse” down to the
Amnesty report is still not propagandish enough for the anti-Syrian
media. Inevitably only the highest number in the range Amnesty claims is
quoted. For some even that is not yet enough. The Associate Press
agency, copied by many outlets, headlines: Report: At least 13,000 hanged in Syrian prison since 2011:
BEIRUT (AP) — Syrian authorities have killed at least 13,000 people
since the start of the 2011 uprising in mass hangings at a prison north
of Damascus known to detainees as “the slaughterhouse,” Amnesty
International said in a report Tuesday.
How does “at least 13,000” conforms to an
already questionable report which claims “13,000” as the top number of a
very wide range?
Here is a link to the report.
Before we look into some details this from the “Executive Summary”:
From December 2015 to December 2016, Amnesty International researched
the patterns, sequence and scale of violations carried out at Saydnaya
Military Prison (Saydnaya). In the course of this investigation, the
organization interviewed 31 men who were detained at Saydnaya, four
prison officials or guards who previously worked at Saydnaya, three
former Syrian judges, three doctors who worked at Tishreen Military
Hospital, four Syrian lawyers, 17 international and national experts on
detention in Syria and 22 family members of people who were or still are
detained at Saydnaya.
On the basis of evidence from people who worked within the prison
authorities at Saydnaya and witness testimony from detainees, Amnesty
International estimates that between 5,000 and 13,000 people were extrajudicially executed at Saydnaya between September 2011 and December 2015.
There are several difficulties with this report.
1. Most of the witnesses are identified
as opposition figures and “former” officials who do not live in Syria.
Some are said to have been remotely interviewed in Syria but it is not
clear if those were living in government or insurgent held areas. Page
The majority of these interviews took place in person in southern
Turkey. The remaining interviews were conducted by telephone or through
other remote means with interviewees still in Syria, or with individuals
based in Lebanon, Jordan, European countries and the USA.
It is well known that the Syrian
insurgency is financed with several billion dollars per years from
foreign state governments. It runs sophisticated propaganda operations.
These witnesses all seem to have interests in condemning the Syrian
government. Not once is an attempt made to provide a possibly divergent
view. Amnesty found the persons it questioned by contacting
international NGOs like itself and known foreign financed opposition
These groups include Urnammu for Justice and Human Rights,
the Syrian Network for Human Rights, and the Syrian Institute for
Justice and Accountability.
2. The numbers Amnesty provides are in a
very wide range. None are documented in lists or similar exhibits. They
are solely based on hearsay and guesstimates of two witnesses:
People who worked within the prison authorities at Saydnaya told
Amnesty International that extrajudicial executions related to the
crisis in Syria first began in September 2011. Since that time, the
frequency with which they have been carried out has varied and
increased. For the first four months, it was usual for between seven and 20 people to be executed every 10-15 days. For the following 11 months,between 20 and 50 people
were executed once a week, usually on Monday nights. For the subsequent
six months, groups of between 20 and 50 people were executed once or twice a week,
usually on Monday and/or Wednesday nights. Witness testimony from
detainees suggests that the executions were conducted at a similar – or
even higher – rate at least until December 2015. Assuming that the death
rate remained the same as the preceding period, Amnesty International estimates that between 5,000 and 13,000 people were extrajudicially executed at Saydnaya between September 2011 and December 2015.
From “between x and y”, “once or twice a
week”, “suggests” and “assuming” the headline numbers are simply
extrapolated in footnote 40 in a back-of-the-envelope calculation; “If A
were true then B would be X”:
These estimates were based on the following calculations. If between seven and 20 were killed every 10-15 days from September to December 2011, the total figure would be between 56 people and 240 people for that period. If between 20 and 50 were killed every week between January and November 2012, the total figure would bebetween 880 and 2,200 for that period. If
between 20 and 50 people were killed in 222 execution sessions
(assuming the executions were carried out twice a week twice a month and
once a week once a month) between December 2012 and December 2015, the
total figure would be between 4,400 and 11,100 for that
period. These calculations produce a minimum figure of 5,336, rounded
down to the nearest thousand as 5,000, and 13,540, rounded down to the
nearest thousand as 13,000.
2. I will not go into the details of
witness statements on which the report is build. They seem at least
exaggerated and are not verifiable at all. In the end it is pure hearsay
on which Amnesty sets it conclusions. One example from page 25:
“Hamid”, a former military officer when he was arrested in 2012, recalled the sounds he heard at night during an execution:
“There was a sound of something being pulled out – like a piece of wood, I’m not sure – and then you would hear the sound of them being strangled… If you put your ears on the floor, you could hear the sound of a kind of gurgling.
This would last around 10 minutes… We were sleeping on top of the sound
of people choking to death. This was normal for me then.”
A court might accept ‘sound of “I’m not
sure” “kind of gurgling” noise through concrete’ as proof that a shower
was running somewhere. But as proof of executions?
Of all the witnesses Amnesty says it
interviewed only two, a former prison official and a former judge, who
describe actual executions (page 25). From the wording of their
statements it is unclear if they have witnessed any hangings themselves
or just describe something they have been told of.
3. The numbers of people Amnesty claims
were executed are – at best – a wild ass guess. How come that Amnesty
can name only very few of those? On page 30 of its report it says:
Former detainees from the red building at Saydnaya provided Amnesty
International with the names of 59 individuals who they witnessed being
taken from their cells in the afternoon, being told that they were being transferred to civilian prisons in Syria. The evidence contained in this report strongly suggests that in fact, these individuals were extrajudicially executed.
Former prison guards and a former prison official from Saydnaya also
provided Amnesty International with the names of 36 detainees who had
been extrajudicially executed in Saydnaya since 2011.
Those 95, some of whom may have been
“executed” – or not, are the only ones Amnesty claims to be able to
name. That is less than 1-2% of the reports central claim of 5,000 to
13,000 executed. All those witnesses could provide no more details of
persons allegedly killed?
Amnesty acknowledges that its numbers are
bogus. Under the headline “Documented Deaths” on page 40 it then adds
additional names and numbers to those above but these are not from
the exact number of deaths in Saydnaya is impossible to specify.
However, the Syrian Network for Human Rights has verified and shared
with Amnesty International the names of 375 individuals who have died in
Saydnaya as a result of torture and other ill-treatmentbetween
March 2011 and October 2016. Of these, 317 were civilians at the time
of their arrest, 39 were members of the Syrian military and 19 were
members of non-state armed groups. In the course of the research for
this report, Amnesty International obtained the names of 36 additional
individuals who died as a result of torture and other ill-treatment in
Saydnaya. These names were provided to Amnesty International by former
detainees who witnessed the deaths in their cells
The “Syrian Network for Human Rights” (SNHR) is a group in the UK probably connected to British foreign intelligence and with dubious monetary sources. It only says:
SNHR funds its work and activities through unconditional grants and donations from individuals and institutions.
Now that is true transparency.
SNHR is known
for rather ridiculous claims about casualties caused by various sides
of the conflict. It is not know what SNHR qualifies as civilians – do
these include armed civil militia? But note that none of the mostly
civilians SNHR claims to have died in the prison are said to have been
executed. How is it possible that a organization frequently quoted in the media as detailed source of casualties in Syria has no record of the 5,000 to 13,000 Amnesty claims were executed?
4. The report is padded up with
before/after satellite pictures of enlarged graveyards in Syria. It
claims that these expansions are a sign of mass graves of government
opponents. But there is zero evidence for that. Many people have died
in Syria throughout the war on all sides of the conflict. The
enlargement, for example, of the Martyrs Cemetery south of Damascus
(p.29/30) is hardly a sign of mass killing of anti-government
insurgents. Would those be honored as martyrs by the government side?
5. The report talks of “extrajudicially
executed” prisoners but then describes (military) court procedures and a
necessary higher up approval of the judgement. One may not like the
laws that govern the Syrian state but the courts and the procedures
Amnesty describes seem to follow Syrian laws and legal processes. They
are thereby – by definition – not extrajudicial.
6. In its Executive Summary the Amnesty
report says that “Death sentences are approved by the Grand Mufti of
Syria and …”. But there is no evidence provided of “approval” by the
Grand Mufti in the details of the report. On page 19 it claims, based on
two former prison and court officials:
The judgement is sent by military post to the Grand Mufti of Syria
and to either the Minister of Defence or the Chief of Staff of the Army,
who are deputized to sign for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and who
specify the date of the execution.
It is very doubtful that the Syrian
government would “deputize” or even inform the Grand Mufti in cases of
military or criminal legal proceedings. Amnesty International may
dislike the fact but Syria is a secular state. The Grand Mufti in Syria
is a civil legal authority for some followers of the Sunni Muslim
religion in Syria but he has no official judiciary role. From the 2010
Swiss dissertation Models of Religious Freedom: Switzerland, the United States, and Syria quoted here:
In Syria a mufti is a legal and religious expert (faqih and ‘alim) who has the power to give legally non-binding recommendations (sing. fatwa, pl. fatawa) in matters of Islamic law.
Queries which are either sought by a shari‘a judge or private individuals regard the personal status laws of the Muslim community only. In the Arab Republic fatawa are given neither to public authorities nor to individual civil servants, ..
Neither the Syrian constitution
nor any Syrian law I can find refers to a role of the Grand Mufti in
any military or civil criminal court proceding. The Amnesty claim
“approved by the Grand Mufti of Syria”is not recorded anywhere else. It
is very likely false. The Grand Mufti, Sheikh Ahmad Badreddin Hassoun,
is a moderate, recognized and accomplished scholar. He should sue Amnesty for this slander.
Syrian law includes a death penalty for certain severe and violent crimes. Before 2011 actual executions in Syria were very rare, most death sentences were commuted. Allegedly the laws were amended
in late 2011, after the war in Syria had started, to include the death
penalty as possible punishment for directly arming terrorists.
It is quite likely that the Syrian
military and/or civil judiciary hand out some death penalties against
captured foreign and domestic “rebels” it finds them guilty of very
severe crimes. It is fighting the Islamic State, al Qaeda and other
extreme groups well known for mass murder and other extreme atrocities.
It is likely that some of those sentences are applied. But the Syrian
government has also provided amnesty to ten-thousands of “rebels” who
fought the government but have laid down their arms.
The claims in the Amnesty report are
based on spurious and biased opposition accounts from outside of the
country. The headline numbers of 5,000 to 13,000 are calculated on the
base of unfounded hypotheticals. The report itself states that only 36
names of allegedly executed persons are known to Amnesty, less than the
number of “witnesses” Amnesty claims to have interviewed. The high
number of claimed execution together with the very low number of names
is not plausible.
The report does not even meet the lowest mark of scientific or legal veracity. It is pure biased propaganda.
Note: An earlier version of this
piece mixed up the Syrian Network for Human Rights (SNHR) and the Syrian
Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR). Both are registered in the UK and
claim to provide accurate casualty data from Syria. Only SNHR is
referenced in this Amnesty report.
The views expressed in this article
are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Information Clearing House.
Syria carried out mass hangings at military prison: Amnesty International:
The Syrian government has executed up to 13,000 prisoners in mass
hangings and carried out systematic torture at a military jail near
Damascus, rights watchdog Amnesty International said on Tuesday.