Chaos from the mass migration is a deliberate strategy. (Photo: Janossy Gergely, Shutterstock)
By Barrie Zwicker (Special to Truth and Shadows)
The refugee crisis in Europe, the largest seen since World War 2, is no accident.
Former U.S. State Department official J. Michael Springmann addresses this verboten subject in his just-released second book Goodbye Europe? Hello, Chaos?: Merkel’s Migrant Bomb. He argues that these refugees and migrants were deliberately created by the American Empire to be used as political weapons.
The misery of asylees, Springmann writes, is one of the planned outcomes of horrendous and unlawful military attacks
on Syria and other countries. These are carried out in proxy wars by
“the West,” including Israel. Springmann writes that Israel “is a
terrorist entity” and “an ever helpful architect of chaos.”
Overall the design is to advance the interests of the American
Empire. The resulting chaos is cold-blooded strategy. Springmann offers
evidence that the Empire has greased the skids for the traumatized
asylum seekers. For instance this technical but telling factoid:
CISCO’s Tactical Operations (TacOps) team supported by
the volunteer Disaster Response Team (DRT) from the U.K. and Ireland,
Google, and NetHope have installed Meraki-based Wi-Fi networks and
device charging stations at more than 17 sites along the migration route
in Southern and Central Europe. [my emphasis]
provides many other facts to buttress his contention that the “migrant
millions” are human pawns. The reference to NetHope, by the way, is
significant. NetHope and Mercy Corps “have backgrounds tied to the US
government,” he writes. “NetHope is a shadowy organization headquartered
in CIA-friendly Fairfax County, Virginia.” Springmann, who also has a
background working for NGOs, names other suspect NGOs that play their
role in the overall coerced migration. One of the motives is to
destabilize Europe as an economic challenger to the U.S.A.
Verboten is the right word. Springmann speaks German, having
spent five years in Stuttgart working for the State Department. He also
worked for the department in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, where he saw
close-up how the Empire recruits prospective terrorists, sends them to
the U.S. for terror training and deploys them in proxy wars. That
experience provided him with the damning fodder for his first book, Visas for Al Qaeda: CIA Handouts That Rocked the World, reviewed on this blog two years ago this month.
“At Jeddah,” Springmann wrote in Visas for Al Qaeda, “to the
best of my knowledge, out of some twenty US citizens assigned to the
consulate, only three people, including myself, worked for the
Department of State. The rest were CIA or NSA officials or their
spouses.” Elsewhere in that book Springmann suggests that essentially
the CIA runs the State Department, and that this is true of many other
U.S. government departments and agencies as well.
Springmann: blames Merkel.
In Goodbye, Europe? Springmann shows his grasp of how
American military, economic, diplomatic, cultural, surveillance,
technological, and vast “intelligence” resources comprise an integrated
colossus using false flag ops, Trojan Horse fronts, incessant propaganda
campaigns, and overt strong-arming. Repeatedly, Imperial Rome’s dictum,
divide et impera, is a hallmark of the Empire’s depredations.
That is a big picture (not quite the big picture). Some of the fine-grained details are revealed in a Norwegian documentary, Recruiting for Jihad.
It had its international premiere at Toronto’s Hot Docs festival in
April-May. The producer had known the key recruiter featured from the
time they were 10-year-olds playing soccer. The wheels within wheels
involved in the recruitment schemes the producer uncovered can hardly be
imagined. Intel agencies need and possess remarkable resources in
micro-managing the recruitment, the terrorism, the false flag ops, and
the evasion of discovery.
Springmann brings evidence to bear on his contention that German
Chancellor Angela Merkel is a scheming author of unnecessary misfortunes
in the form of the largest influx of migrants to any European country.
At one point he holds her entirely to blame for this. (“It was Merkel
and her government who invited all the feared Islamists into the
country.”) Yet contradictorily Springmann overall lays the blame
squarely on the American Empire.
That she’s such a baddie is also hard to square that with what is
known about her overall. She’s earned the nickname “Chancellor of the
World” and appears more dedicated to peace and understanding than most
of her peers, by a long shot.
What Germany’s “V-men” do is likely not within her perfect control.
The V-men come in for criticism by Springmann. The term comes from the
German for a trusted person, Vertrauensmann. They’re really secret police. Hitler was recruited to be a “V” man while he was in the World War I postwar army.
The book is not without prosaic shortcomings. Apart from whether
Merkel is as large a villain as Springmann suggests, there are some
questionable alleged facts and insupportable generalizations.
Springmann includes a number of reports of alleged behaviours by
migrants in Europe, from theft to sexual and other violent assaults,
including rape and murder. His usual footnotes pointing to reliable
sources dry up in regard to some of these reports. One example is a
quote from the tabloid Bild that in 2015 “migrant misdeeds” in
Germany numbered 208,344—or 23 crimes per hour. The paper said it got
the number from a confidential police report that it was given
exclusively. Worth noting is that the eminent German author Heinrich
Boll wrote in an essay that what Bild does “isn’t cryptofascist anymore, not fascistoid, but naked fascism. Agitation, lies, dirt.” That is from a Wikipedia entry.
The emotional impact of most of these Bild reports leaves
this reviewer with understandable skepticism. Are some of these examples
of the very deceptions Springmann in other parts of the book decries?
This reviewer encountered one of these fake reports in January 2016 and
wrote a letter to the editor of The Globe and Mail about it, which was published. It read in part:
An exacerbating factor in the divide over refugees is the
insertion of disinformation by the right into the situation. An example
is cited in Der Spiegel on Jan. 5, headlined The Case of the Murdered Goats: Exploring Germany’s Far-Right Rumour Mill.
Reporters investigated “outrage over an incident in the eastern
German town of Lostau. Locals had accused refugees of plundering a
petting zoo, slaughtering some goats and eating them around a campfire.”
The story, said the writers, “aimed directly at the heart of German
animal lovers, taxpayers and immigration opponents. But there was just
one problem: It wasn’t true.
It turns out that there hadn’t been a petting zoo in Lostau for years. And this was just one example among many.
Valuable as it is, this book also is in places a cautionary tale
about making sweeping generalizations. One example must suffice. On page
181 we find this:
If people forget their history, reject their heritage,
and dismiss their identity, then why object to aliens changing European
The peoples of Europe understand this. Their leaders don’t. Those
want to cobble together a new multicultural Europe, erasing the one that
already exists. And, so far, the replacement doesn’t work and likely
can’t be made to work—except in the minds of the globalists. The people
vigorously oppose these government policies. They denounce their
leaders’ abandoning constitutional obligations to defend their country’s
borders, territorial integrity, and democracy.
The generalizations here include “peoples of Europe” who “understand
this,” “replacement doesn’t work,” “the people vigorously oppose,” and
“they denounce…” It’s reminiscent of Theresa May’s repeated contention
that “the people of Britain voted for” Brexit when in fact the vote was
close to 50-50.
These generalizations lead Springmann to make an assessment that was
understandable even a few months ago, namely that (essentially right
wing) nationalism remains in an upward trajectory.
But since he wrote that, Macron, ostensibly a centrist and probably a
globalist, has risen fast in France. Springmann writes on page 184 that
“the left’s policies are clearly bankrupt” and “the left has no plan”
on page 185. Yet Jeremy Corbyn, very to the left, scored heavily against
Theresa May with specific plans. UKIP is dead in the water, obtaining
two per cent of the votes in the British election. The story of right
wing populism is not paved with certainty, even if right wing populists
are certain they’re right.
There are two lesser shortcomings. One is an occasional lack of copy
editing. For instance, about half of page 19 is devoted to the arrest by
North Rhine-Westphalia police of “five members of a ‘terrorist
recruiting network.’” On page 177 the same half page of text is repeated
almost word for word.
In his email to me to which the pdf file of his book was attached, Springmann offered this:
Easier to write than the first but much harder to edit.
Could have spent more time on it but thought with European elections was
so timely I needed to get it out.
Understandable. Today there’s justification for more “instant books”
containing vital perspectives, which this one contains. But
instantaneity carries prices. I think they’re worth paying. A second
edition could solve a lot.
In other places Springmann repeats information, but he says he is
doing so. And I’m with him on that. Repetition is a pillar of effective
communication. This pillar should not be at the disposal of the
merchants of lies only.
Another format flaw that could have been avoided with the aid of a
competent editor is that some material is misplaced. The most obvious
example is at the end, where the conclusions are offered but not really
found. Instead, his important conclusions, referred to earlier in this
review, are found in the body of the book. An interested reader will
encounter them where they are.
These failings are more than counterbalanced by the damning evidence
and the damning perspective Springmann brings to the table, based on his
life experiences working within different sectors of the American
Empire and his wide-ranging research. Four stars out of five.